David Creswell, professional violist |
David Creswell is a violist in New York City, has performed with the New York Philharmonic, Broadway shows, is principal violist of the Greenwich (CT) Symphony, and has recorded >100 film scores* since moving to NYC in 1997. He also happens to
be my brother-in-law.
JD: As a musician, what is the process to get a gig to record a film score?
DC: Composers typically have control over who they hire to record scores,
although sometimes studios have a say also. Composers have relationships with various musicians and groups in town (NYC) whose sound
and aesthetic they like. Composers have a distinctive voice, and producers and directors use different composers to fit their own voice. Some composers
are really dramatic, others are more subtle and cerebral. Composers work with
contractors who actually do the hiring – I have several contractors that I work
for. Contractors also have different vibes and working styles and the music you
get out of that is very different. Specific composers like specific vibes that work for their
music and their process of recording the score.
JD: Who are your film composer idols?
DC: Erich Wolfgang Korngold, to name one, but really all from Korngold’s era, including Copland and Shostakovich. They were great because they were first and foremost serious concert composers. They had learned from earlier musical masters such as Mahler, Strauss, and Nadia Boulanger. Their goal was to be the next Beethoven, Strauss, etc, and their music is complex and rich. Korngold left Europe because of WWII, but he and many of his fellow emigres found a place in Hollywood where they poured their dense creative musical energy into film scoring. It’s a shame that we’ve lost that today to a degree. I understand directors not wanting the music to distract from their story, but I really love when the music is more of a forward character in the film experience like it was then.
JD: What trends have you observed in film scoring during the 20+ years of your experience?
DC: First, the economics of recording film scores have changed a lot in the
past 20 years. One of the biggest changes is that many scores are now recorded
in Eastern Europe as opposed to NY and LA because orchestras there are less
expensive and residuals aren't paid. (In NYC and LA musicians get residuals--shares from how much the movie sells afterwards). And today, there is only one
big space left in NY for large orchestras to score: the Manhattan Center
ballroom. When working with composers in
Europe, producers and composers can fly over with equipment to record with less
expensive orchestras. They can even work remotely with an orchestra in Europe,
for example, live using web sharing technology!
Another trend relates to the aesthetics of the music itself--what sound the filmmakers want. Tastes have changed since 1997. Today, scores have a less symphonic identity and are charged to create color and mood that is generated by symphonic instruments but with less motivic influences. It's less melodic, and the overall structures of the music are smaller. These sounds are mixed in with newer genres (e.g. hip hop). Sometimes the playing for these types of less melodic scores requires no vibrato, or is consistently mezzo-piano, and can be sleep-inducing for the musicians because of the often very slow, unexpressive takes.
A refreshing contrast comes to mind--I performed on the recording of Rachel Portman's score for the 2004 version of The Manchurian Candidate (with Denzel Washington, Meryl Streep, and Liev Schreiber, directed by Jonathan Demme). The score was a mix of genres, but I recall when we recorded the beginning of the nominating convention; this scene had two minutes of incredibly loud, patriotic music--a great contrast to typical moody delicate music. We were told to blast the hell out of it – that was fun.
And technology has advanced so much – now you can mix things
together using computers, after recording groups of instruments in a more
piecemeal manner. Leeway still exists in remixing and changing – that is why
scores are often recorded with less vibrato playing--phrase shapes can be
manipulated more easily in post-production. Today there are even people out there trying to invent ways of synthesizing an
entire score without benefit of musicians!
But thankfully nothing matches the human feeling of live musicians
playing.
JD: One of my favorite scores is that of Miklós Rózsa for The Strange Love of Martha Ivers (1946). It came to mind when you mentioned rich and complex film music. (proceeds to play a clip from the film's opening credits; the film music suite is linked in the YouTube clip below).
DC: Hmm... Rózsa was really great. Listening, I hear influences of Richard Strauss and Wagner. Rózsa and his contemporaries imitated music that they loved from their childhood.
These composers often used motifs representing characters or themes throughout their movies, a technique that was developed and used extensively by Richard Wagner.
JD: It seems that there is an increasing trend to play scores live with film screenings for an audience, in a concert venue.
DC: Yes. About 15-20 years ago we did some concerts that presented parts or scenes of a film, but not the entire film. I remember doing a concert showcasing the great age of Korngold, which included scenes from The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938). This format worked because composers then tended to write “a piece” for a scene – one segment that could stand on its own.
David Creswell's viola, in close-up |
One of the most significant experiences I had doing this was when the NY Philharmonic played live to West Side Story. In fact, it was the NY Phil that had recorded the film score in 1961, with composer Leonard Bernstein at the helm; there were friends of mine playing with me for this recent performance who were there in the orchestra when the score was recorded originally!
JD: What do you think makes these screenings with live music so popular?
DC: First, I think the sound is better with live instruments--the richness and complexity of the sound come out more when you’re in the room with the performer – and also, art is being created in the moment. Your experience of the movie is richer due to your emotions being heightened with the experience of live music. And, the audience loves it. People showed up in costume to the NY Philharmonic's performance of the Star Wars films. When they did Babe, people brought their kids.
DC: First, I think the sound is better with live instruments--the richness and complexity of the sound come out more when you’re in the room with the performer – and also, art is being created in the moment. Your experience of the movie is richer due to your emotions being heightened with the experience of live music. And, the audience loves it. People showed up in costume to the NY Philharmonic's performance of the Star Wars films. When they did Babe, people brought their kids.
JD: What are some challenges for a musician performing a score live to film?
DC: It's a challenge to get the sound balance right--you're in a concert hall but you're playing with a film that already has certain sound balances, and the sound and actors' voices reflect the rooms that the actors are in. In movie theaters, the acoustic space is usually dead. They compensate by playing it really loud through speakers in the theatre to create the needed ambiance. But you can’t do that in the concert hall.
JD: I especially love attending screenings of silent films with newly-composed scores performed live. Have you had experience playing for any silent films?
DC: I once had a project with composer Stephen Endelman -- he wrote a new score for a Swedish silent
film from 1918: The Outlaw and His Wife (directed by and starring legendary Victor Sjöström; Berg-Ejvind och hans hustru in the original Swedish). Endelman wrote a chamber ensemble score, and we performed it in small, intimate venues in NYC like The Knitting Factory, with small groups of about 50 people attending screenings. I also got to perform Chaplin's City Lights in concert with the NY Philharmonic in Shanghai as
well as New York City--it was very interesting to perform it for a Chinese audience, because
different parts of the film, as well as the music, resonate with audiences from
different cultures.
JD: What is different when playing for silent films vs. sound films?
DC: Playing live to silent films is freeing because you don't worry about drowning out dialogue or sound effects. Playing for a silent film you're free to use the entire range of your creativity with the sound that you’re making.
The Outlaw and His Wife - Victor Sjöström & Edith Erastoff |
JD: What is different when playing for silent films vs. sound films?
DC: Playing live to silent films is freeing because you don't worry about drowning out dialogue or sound effects. Playing for a silent film you're free to use the entire range of your creativity with the sound that you’re making.
JC: Thank you, I learned so much!
DC: You're very welcome!
An informative and fascinating interview! I'm one that also had the chance to see City Lights with a live orchestra. Great experience of course.
ReplyDeleteOooh, fortunate you! I've not seen that one yet with live music, but I expect I will. The best (maybe only??) way to experience silent film these days, if one is lucky enough to have a local cinema or theater with this capability. Thanks for reading!
Delete